Meet results 2014 clifton larson invite

University of Wisconsin-Stout - Women's UW-Stout Open Results

Malibu High Invitational Track MeetMalibu High School and Santa Paula High School would like to invite your school to participate in our early. Results available: HTML · PDF · TM Results Notes:Athletes are selected and invited based on short course times. TM Events. .. SwimMAC Clifton Larson Allen Meet hosted by SwimMAC Carolina Charlotte Latin School. Licensed to PrimeTime Timing - Contractor License HY-TEK's Meet Manager 1/ 24/ PM Stout Open Johnson Fieldhouse - UW-Stout Menomonie.

Payton Romersberger 6th, Kole Rigsby 11th, The Top 5 ran to the 3rd fastest time ever run by a Titan team on this hilly course, averaging Only the State-Qualifying teams of Races begin at 9 AM. The weather was beautiful, with temperatures around 74 degrees for the 4 PM start. Valerie Hamilton th, The Titan duo held a similar pace for the final 1. Uphoff ran to her lifetime best by 45 seconds with a 2-mile adjusted time of The pack looked great for the Titans, with Lauren Shaffer th, Nelson and Younse ran the entire race together, pushing each other to big PRs of 28 seconds and 42 seconds, respectively.

Nellie Melick th, Sam Bushert 29th, TJ Supan 79th, Reed Newcomb th, The Boys Varsity race of the day went to 5 runner Dean Witzig st, In the Girls Open race, Aubrey Phillips th, Phillips was followed by Heidi Hunsinger nd, Cummings missed a PR by 4 seconds.

Staton 33 seconds and Moss 37 seconds collected big PRs, while Erwin, Ruppe, and Melick were all within 8 seconds of a lifetime best. The Girls ran to their fastest team time this season, while the Boys made the Top 25 All-Time Titan Team times for the third straight meet. The Girls Race is at 4: The EPG Girls have run to victory at this four-team meet 8 years in row, A September sun was shining brightly, and the temperature was near 90 degrees at the start of the first race.

The football field finish is reliably intense. Gramm not only collected an second season best time, but also earned a lifetime best with a performance that was 5 seconds faster than her time at the State Finals. Sixth-grader Lauren Shaffer 23rd, Both finished strong to edge out other runners, with Uphoff clocking even splits of 7. Joci Nelson 29th, Nellie Melick 32nd, Annabelle Younse 36th, There were 63 girls in the race.

With Corpus Christi putting their entire team in the Top 25 and St. Matthew scorers placing between 8th and 17th, only the 3rd place trophy was up for grabs, and it looked like it would go to either Dee-Mack or EPG. Both teams had only one runner in the Top Top 5 teams were Corpus Christi 21St.

Sam Bushert 2nd, Bushert was at the back of the chase pack in 6th as runners crossed the bridge shortly before the m mark at the base of the big hill. By the time runners crossed the bridge at the 1. His perfect splits of 5. Payton Romersberger 8th, Newcomb tied his lifetime best. Kole Rigsby 14th, It was a strong showing by the Titan Boys Varsity team, as their team average of Their team effort also marked the second week in a row that they made it into the record books as one of the Top 25 EPG team efforts ever.

Their pack time was the best this season at 43 seconds.

  • Red Knight Invite
  • Wisconsin-Whitewater Athletics

Heidi Hunsinger 3rd, Callie Whitcomb 12th, All three ran negative splits in the runner race. Garrison Meyer 1st, Jack Ewing 2nd, Keegan Ruppe 12th, Chris Staton 28th, Races are scheduled for 4: Just under 1, runners were competing, with a variety of Class 1A, 2A, and 3A schools from across the state in attendance. There were some slippery spots on the saturated course as a few raindrops continued to fall.

Wisconsin-Whitewater Athletics

Titan PRs fell all morning long as well. Valerie Hamilton 74th, It was a sparkling second PR for Hamilton. Hillary Gramm th, Gramm ran 46 seconds faster than last year despite course conditions, and closed to within 13 seconds of her lifetime best set at State Lizzie Uphoff th, Joci Nelson th, Annabelle Younse th, Their were Varsity Girls competing, with Alex Reinhart of Parkside JH leading her team to victory while winning the meter race in 11 minutes 27 seconds.

The Titan girls placed 29th, between St. Philomena 28th, and Metamora 30th, Sam Bushert 19th, Payton Romersberger 80th, TJ Supan 95th, The EPG Boys team placed 13th. Heidi Hunsinger th, Elise Morrison th, Callie Whitcomb th, Garrison Meyer 61st, Keegan Ruppe th, Dylan Moss th, Teams came to run the popular meter Furrow Farm course from as far away as Ottawa 60 milesKnoxville 70 milesand Athens 80 miles.

The hills were steep, the creeks were muddy, and the conditions were challenging. In the Girls Varsity race, Valerie Hamilton 13th, Lauren Shaffer 68th, Varsity runner Joci Nelson 83rd, Nellie Melick 84th, The Titan girls placed 10th with points, just one point behind Dunlap Valley but well ahead of Delavan and Dee-Mack In the Boys Varsity race, Sam Bushert 2nd, Bushert took the lead 0.

With Bushert on the verge of falling further back at 1. He then put the hammer down, kicked up the final hill, and closed to within 2 seconds of Maas before crossing the line in the 6th fastest EPG time at Furrow on record.

Wisconsin-Whitewater Athletics - Pointer Invite Results

Payton Romersberger 13th, Both boys clocked faster times than last year on this course, Romersberger running to the biggest Furrow Best FB of any Titan, slicing 80 seconds off his time.

Reed Newcomb 26th, Dean Witzig 58th, Titan athletes competing in the runner Girls Open race included Callie Whitcomb 48th, Jack Erwin 25th, Waylon Melick 84th, Races are scheduled for 9: It was sunny and pleasant, with temperatures just a shade under 80 degrees.

Valerie Hamilton 4th, Lizzie Uphoff 7th, Joci Nelson 13th, Lauren Shaffer 15th, Nellie Melick 19th, The other five girls running for the Titans were Heidi Hunsinger 23rd, Cummings clocked a 2-minute lifetime best, while Phillips ran to a 3 minute 25 second PR. All 12 girls ran to season PRs. The girls strong pack of 5 in the top 15 enabled them to earn the team victory with the top 3 team scores showing EPG 47Metamora 51Blessed Sacrament The boys were led by TJ Supan 4th, Romersberger ran to an adjusted 2-mile lifetime best Reed Newcomb 7th, Dean Witzig 20th, Meade broke his lifetime best from last season by over a minute, while Ruppe, Moss, and Melick all sliced about 2 minutes off their previous best times.

Staton dropped the most time of all ten EPG boys who ran to season PRs by cutting 2 minutes 49 seconds, running a 2-mile adjusted time of The boys were missing top runner Sam Bushert, but still managed to place second in the 7-team field. Twenty-five teams and runners are registered and races begin at 4 PM. Other then some scattered hickory nuts and a mud pit on the trails courtesy of recent rains, the 1. She was followed by Hillary Gramm 10th, Cassidy Bergquist 17th, Joci Nelson 21st, Callie Whitcomb 26th, Whitcomb and Phillips ran to lifetime best times.

In the Boys race, Sam Bushert 3rd, But then the Titan pack rolled in, and after TJ Supan 8th, Now it was up to the 5 runners, and Dean Witzig 16th, Kole Rigsby 18th, Six runners finished between The EPG boys have won all three of their meets this year. Much of the 2-mile course winds through wooded trails. Wood chips had replaced the bridge at the base of the finishing descent, but the challenging uphill at 1.

Seven teams were competing in the Girls Varsity race, as Heyworth elected to put all their runners in the Open.

The Titans started patiently in the back and moved up nicely through the runner field. At the finish line it was Lizzie Uphoff 18th, All 3 girls turned in season-best performances. Elise Morrison 33rd, Annabelle Younse 34th, Team scoring for the girls was tight with St. Agnes 50 just edging Olympia 53 and Monticello El Paso-Gridley placed 6th, just three points behind Christ the King, whose top athlete Kaitlyn Lee ran to the individual victory in a time of 12 minutes 38 seconds. Sam Bushert 1st, It was the fifth-fastest time ever run on this course by a Titan athlete.

TJ Supan 6th, For example, every traditional meeting has an agenda, an objective, and someone who directs the meeting. Next, we reviewed research on how walking meetings are conducted. The mainstream literature outlined a common approach to conducting a walking meeting, and the grey literature provided anecdotal tips and instructions that suggested a similar setup and design ie, create an agenda, assign roles, take notes, and so on 10— From this formative research on traditional and walking meetings 12—14common themes were combined and outlined into a 7-item core component list that reflects best practices for walking meetings and serves as the foundation for a uniform WaM protocol Box.

The WaM protocol was assessed across a 3-week period: Create an agenda for your WaM. To make the walk more comfortable, bring items such as water, sunglasses, and sunscreen. Have the group leader assign roles to each walking meeting group member. Follow the prescribed route. Walk for at least 30 minutes. After the walking meeting, sit and conclude to wrap up meeting; take care of paperwork or other tasks that could not be accomplished during WaM.

Study measures survey and accelerometry After recruitment and consent, study participants were asked at baseline to complete a paper-based survey with questions on sociodemographic characteristics and standardized measures of self-reported PA the International Physical Activity Questionnaire [IPAQ] Although we administered the entire IPAQ to study participants, for this analysis we used only the 6 work-related PA questions.

The identical survey measures were administered 3 more times: On the first day, the accelerometer was initialized by the research team and participants were shown how to attach and remove the device. Participants were instructed to wear the accelerometer all day except while they were sleeping, taking a shower, or swimming.

Participants also kept a daily log throughout the 3 weeks of the pilot study documenting the beginning and end of work shifts along with times they wore the accelerometer and when they removed it. The accelerometers recorded data in 1-minute intervals, providing the number of counts for each minute for 21 days.

A count was defined as any activity that was measured by the accelerometer. At the end of 21 days, the researchers retrieved the accelerometer from the worker and downloaded its data to the study computer. For minutes associated with the workday, each minute was assigned a level of PA intensity according to definitions established by Freedson and colleagues PA levels were analyzed on the day of the week each group had its walking meeting.

For example, if a group held its walking meeting on Wednesday during week 2 and week 3, we collected data on the number of steps taken on those implementation days and on the previous Wednesday of their baseline week.

Measures of WaM protocol implementation, feasibility, and acceptability were defined Table 1. Focus group sessions were conducted to ask participants questions about the extent to which the WaM protocol was implemented, whether the WaM protocol was feasible, and whether it was acceptable to study participants.

Focus groups To complement our survey data, we conducted a 1-hour focus group with each walking group at the end of the pilot study to discuss 3 broad domains: The focus group team consisted of a moderator and another researcher who collected paperwork and took notes. The focus group questions were developed after collecting the quantitative data and were based on the WaM protocol. We used grounded-theory methodology 17,18 to develop a discussion guide, which consisted of a mix of 4 to 7 open-ended questions for each domain.

Statistical analysis To examine how the walking meetings affected objectively measured PA, we compared accelerometry data for the day of the baseline week with the accelerometry data for the 2 days of the walking meetings. Four levels of PA were examined: Therefore, we combined moderate, vigorous, and very vigorous PA levels into one category to examine changes in PA across the 3-week study period. Differences between periods were assessed by using paired t tests.

We used conservative 2-tail tests and emphasize that this descriptive study was not designed to determine cause and effect. Focus group discussions were transcribed, and text was entered into NVivo version 10 QSR International Pty Ltd for electronic coding, data retrieval, and analysis. Inductive thematic analysis was used to identify main themes across groups. Emerging themes were verified through discussion, and a coding framework based on the themes and domains was developed Transcripts were coded by H.

The coding was reviewed by 2 coauthors A. Top Results The 17 participants had a mean age of Mean body mass index was Seven team leaders who were invited to participate expressed interest in the study but did not meet eligibility requirements. Initially, the sample comprised 8 team leaders, 2 groups of 3 members, and 6 groups of 2 members; one participant eventually dropped out.

Of the 8 groups, all completed at least one walking meeting and 7 groups completed both walking meetings. All participants agreed to the WaM strategy after being taught how to organize and conduct the walking meeting during study initiation. Although the protocol suggested 30 minutes as a minimum for the walking meeting, all groups walked from 30 to 40 minutes.

Five groups followed the prescribed path. Of the 3 groups that did not follow the path, 2 groups took a different route to accomplish tasks at other campus locations during their walking meeting; the third group took a wrong turn but later rejoined the prescribed path. All groups agreed that the WaM protocol was acceptable according to the measures defined Table 1including the suitability of walking meetings for their work setting.

When we asked focus group participants about the extent to which they implemented the components of the WaM protocol, 7 groups created and printed an agenda to take on their walk, 3 groups took written notes, and one group engaged in a sit-and-conclude session after their walk. All groups used their established meeting times and places for their walking meetings, and all groups felt they had proper attire and items to make their walk comfortable.

Six groups completed 5 of 7 prescribed WaM protocol components. The 2 components least frequently completed were the sit-and-conclude session and creating an agenda. The mean SD number of minutes in light PA on walking-meeting days among all participants decreased from On the day of the walking meeting, the mean number of minutes spent in moderate, vigorous, or very vigorous PA increased from Nine participants did not meet the 10, steps goal during baseline week; by week 3, two of these 9 participants reached 10, steps.

When asked about their typical meeting at work, participants had the following comments: Sometimes our meetings get cut short. Scheduling, vacation, coverage, etc. When asked how teams organized their walking meetings, participants stated the following: So, I kinda multitask during our meetings.

I loved it [walking meeting]. It was very energizing, very invigorating. We got a lot done, we went through our agenda completely, efficiently, and it helped us generate ideas as we were discussing a topic. Top Discussion Traditional seated meetings that were converted into a walking format using the WaM protocol increased moderate, vigorous, and very vigorous PA levels by 10 minutes among our sample of white-collar workers.

Many jobs in the white-collar workforce involve a disproportionate amount of sitting time, which can increase the risk for being overweight or obese Although several interventions have aimed to increase PA levels in the workplace eg, by using stability balls instead of chairs and sit—stand work stations instead of traditional desksthe scientific literature consists of either low-quality evidence or equivocal results on the effect of these interventions.

Data from this pilot study suggest that walking meetings might provide an alternative to the sedentary workdays of white-collar workers.

Focus groups suggest that the WaM protocol was feasible, accepted, and successfully implemented by study participants.

Create Opportunities — CLA Helps Clients From Start to Finish

Among the 8 participating groups, 7 completed both walking meetings. These findings are in contrast with those of Cooper et al, who found that university employees who reported a lack of time for PA and perceived that fitness facilities at work were expensive did not engage in PA We found that walking meetings were accepted and implemented by white-collar university employees in this pilot study and that these workers could easily fit a walking meeting into the workday with little to no burden to their workflow.

This study has several limitations, including a small number of participants and a short duration. Time constraints a 7-month academic year and a limited number of accelerometers prohibited the research team from recruiting more participants and conducting additional cycles.

The use of accelerometers may have caused a Hawthorne-type or reactivity event Despite these limitations, this pilot study has several strengths, including the collection of both quantitative and qualitative data, a flexible walking meeting protocol, and a uniform community of workers who engaged in similar tasks.

A unique aspect of this study was the flexible walking meeting protocol. Rather than allowing participants to engage in a walking meeting without guidance, the research team provided participants with suggestions and a prescribed route with the aim of eliminating confusion, providing autonomy, and stimulating productivity while walking in a safe work environment. This study adds information on walking meetings to the scientific literature, where little research exists.